In the recent incident of Dr. APJ Kalam been frisked at the IGI airport by the staff of Continental Airlines has created some news. The Airline has also tendered an apology to Dr. Kalam for the inconvienence caused – this is as reported in the TimesofIndia daily newspaper on 22nd July 2009.
Now does that apology mean that Continental Airlines will not frisk any VIP’s in future while they board the flight..? I see a security concern here.
Not having the VIP’s frisked before boarding the flight is a security hole, nevertheless these people are always surrounded with guards and they move with apt protection. But these people (if found an opportunity) could be utilized in carrying materials (those prohibited in flight) to be taken very easily, which will pass them through all sorts of check without any objection.
The materials can be put into the VIP’s pockets or hand baggage without his/her notice or he/she could be threatened to carry some stuff, which he/she might not be able to disclose. This can be done since this is a known security hole.
Now the next concern is the rule that says
“Indian laws exempt dignitaries like former presidents, ex-PMs, Chief Justice of India and even Robert Vadra from being frisked at airports.” – quote TimeofIndia.
Suppose, lets say the law of the country where the airline is flying too (destination) is stringent and has ordered the airline to frisk all passengers boarding that flight. Now if there would have been an incident mid-air, who would take up the responsibility..?
In this scenario, does the airline follow the rule of the country currently landed at OR the rule to which the airline will be flying?
Your thoughts.
