<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Assessing C-I-A values.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://infosecminds.com/2009/12/23/assessing-c-i-a-values/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://infosecminds.com/2009/12/23/assessing-c-i-a-values/</link>
	<description>For like-minded people</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 06:04:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Johnston</title>
		<link>http://infosecminds.com/2009/12/23/assessing-c-i-a-values/comment-page-1/#comment-117</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Johnston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 16:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecminds.com/?p=195#comment-117</guid>
		<description>Great article, too bad that this isn&#039;t more of a &quot;common sense&quot; aspect of information security.  The asset list that I&#039;ve always use is: People, Process, Data, Tools. This would match your &quot;Information&quot; to my &quot;Data&quot;, &quot;Service&quot; to &quot;Process&quot;, and &quot;H/W &amp; S/W&quot; to &quot;Tools&quot;.  At least I got the &quot;People&quot; part right ;o) ...
I like &quot;Data&quot; as the base point to include data, information, knowledge, and wisdom; the whole hierarchy of this set.  If you think about knowledge and wisdom it starts pushing our security thoughts to what&#039;s in peoples&#039; heads; a point that is too often easy to breach.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article, too bad that this isn&#8217;t more of a &#8220;common sense&#8221; aspect of information security.  The asset list that I&#8217;ve always use is: People, Process, Data, Tools. This would match your &#8220;Information&#8221; to my &#8220;Data&#8221;, &#8220;Service&#8221; to &#8220;Process&#8221;, and &#8220;H/W &amp; S/W&#8221; to &#8220;Tools&#8221;.  At least I got the &#8220;People&#8221; part right ;o) &#8230;<br />
I like &#8220;Data&#8221; as the base point to include data, information, knowledge, and wisdom; the whole hierarchy of this set.  If you think about knowledge and wisdom it starts pushing our security thoughts to what&#8217;s in peoples&#8217; heads; a point that is too often easy to breach.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChrisSummer</title>
		<link>http://infosecminds.com/2009/12/23/assessing-c-i-a-values/comment-page-1/#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>ChrisSummer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 16:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecminds.com/?p=195#comment-70</guid>
		<description>Kudo to the post and interesting comment, i also bookmarked your RSS feeds for more updates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kudo to the post and interesting comment, i also bookmarked your RSS feeds for more updates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

