<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for InfoSecMinds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://infosecminds.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://infosecminds.com</link>
	<description>For like-minded people</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 18:07:26 +0300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Parkerian Hexad by Michel E. Kabay, PhD, CISSP-ISSMP</title>
		<link>http://infosecminds.com/2009/08/16/149/comment-page-1/#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>Michel E. Kabay, PhD, CISSP-ISSMP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 18:07:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecminds.com/?p=149#comment-76</guid>
		<description>You can download a narrated PowerPoint lecture discussing the Parkerian Hexad from

http://www.mekabay.com/overviews/hexad_ppt.zip</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can download a narrated PowerPoint lecture discussing the Parkerian Hexad from</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mekabay.com/overviews/hexad_ppt.zip" rel="nofollow">http://www.mekabay.com/overviews/hexad_ppt.zip</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Assessing C-I-A values. by ChrisSummer</title>
		<link>http://infosecminds.com/2009/12/23/assessing-c-i-a-values/comment-page-1/#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>ChrisSummer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 16:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecminds.com/?p=195#comment-70</guid>
		<description>Kudo to the post and interesting comment, i also bookmarked your RSS feeds for more updates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kudo to the post and interesting comment, i also bookmarked your RSS feeds for more updates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Physical Security &#8211; At it&#8217;s best. by Binoy K</title>
		<link>http://infosecminds.com/2009/11/09/physical-security-at-its-best/comment-page-1/#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator>Binoy K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 18:26:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecminds.com/?p=151#comment-69</guid>
		<description>A very interesting article. It is very common that many people just trust those who are regulars and are good at them. If it is done deliberately, it may be used as a social engineering attack vector.

Good article</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A very interesting article. It is very common that many people just trust those who are regulars and are good at them. If it is done deliberately, it may be used as a social engineering attack vector.</p>
<p>Good article</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Service Asset – A Requirement or Duplication by Vinod Kumar Puthuseeri</title>
		<link>http://infosecminds.com/2009/07/05/service-asset-%e2%80%93-a-requirement-or-duplication/comment-page-1/#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>Vinod Kumar Puthuseeri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 10:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecminds.com/?p=125#comment-62</guid>
		<description>Hello Venu,

Exactly. So if there is two different departments availing two different services, which is provided through and single asset, then each department will identify their service asset and provide the availability parameters. They will not identify the hardware assets. Hence recording both hardware assets and service assets is required.

Regards

Vinod</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Venu,</p>
<p>Exactly. So if there is two different departments availing two different services, which is provided through and single asset, then each department will identify their service asset and provide the availability parameters. They will not identify the hardware assets. Hence recording both hardware assets and service assets is required.</p>
<p>Regards</p>
<p>Vinod</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Service Asset – A Requirement or Duplication by Venu</title>
		<link>http://infosecminds.com/2009/07/05/service-asset-%e2%80%93-a-requirement-or-duplication/comment-page-1/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>Venu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 10:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecminds.com/?p=125#comment-61</guid>
		<description>Hi Vinod,
This was a confusion for me for longtime when I entered into Infosec profession. The way I understand is as follows:-
The the individual equipment&#039;s availability asessment will be limited to the extend of that asset&#039;s contribution to the services it provides. Sometimes it may be possible that a single asset may also be used for multiple services. Here depends on the service and the architecture, the availability value of that particular asset may vary and this may taken into consideration.
Regs
Venu</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Vinod,<br />
This was a confusion for me for longtime when I entered into Infosec profession. The way I understand is as follows:-<br />
The the individual equipment&#8217;s availability asessment will be limited to the extend of that asset&#8217;s contribution to the services it provides. Sometimes it may be possible that a single asset may also be used for multiple services. Here depends on the service and the architecture, the availability value of that particular asset may vary and this may taken into consideration.<br />
Regs<br />
Venu</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
